So
the International Federation of Wine Critics has just finished its
deliberations over which terms are to be internationally approved
when it comes to written wine appreciation, and which are on the way
out: and their recommendations (in the forthcoming Oenophile
Glossary)
make fascinating reading for anyone interested in wine and wine
writing.
This
year, in an effort to drag wine criticism firmly into the
twenty-first century, there's an emphasis on modern technology and
the contemporary arts. Thus, we find among the new verbal
inclusions,
Tipping
point, Bruschetta tendencies, Aspect ratio, Ringtone, Undercoat, Mosh
pit and
Kiera
Knightley
- this last to denote a wine, usually white, which looks fantastic in
the bottle but turns out to be a bit on the thin side. Among the
terms being phased out, or deprecated,
to use the software developer's jargon, are Woody,
Chewy, Jammy
and, thank God, Minerality.
Debate still rages over the proposed replacement of Structure
by Armature:
both are currently permissible, although I have my doubts that
Armature
will prove sufficiently of the now to gain traction. I expect it to
be replaced in the near future either by Strategy
or Floorplan,
but we shall see.
Peach
will be phased out completely by 2015, to be replaced by New
car smell;
while Gooseberry
will make way for Romanian
persimmon
- a relief to all of us who have no idea what a gooseberry actually
tastes like; while Raspberry,
plum, blackcurrant
and, indeed, all other soft fruits will be harmonised into the single
term Melbury™
for
the sake of clarity and simplicity. In a couple of nods to Hollywood,
Blood pack
will be used to denote any of those repulsive 15% or more Californian
reds, while Russell Crowe
will be used for all other heavy-hitting New World wines, including
Australian Shiraz and Argentinian Malbec. Angular
is both in and out, while further talks are being held on the future
of Robust. At
the same time, a working party is looking into
Interface, Mellow, Chupa Chups, Personality
and Narrative-driven,
and will report early in the new year.
What
else are we saying goodbye to? Well, Velvety
has the executioner's axe hanging over it, as does Finesse.
Assuming they're both fully
decommissioned
by 2016, expect to see Build
quality
step in, as a stimulant to what will by then be a declining Chinese
market. And get used to living without that old favourite,
Approachable.
This will be broken up into three new categories: Nice,
Businesslike
and Sexy.
It's
a lot to take in, but in a mood of experimentation I decided to try
out some of the new vocabulary on a bottle of M & S Côtes
du Rhône (£5.79), to see how it feels in practice. Nice bottle, by
the way, heritage label and a cork for sheer class, enough even for
PK, but after that? Not much in the way of a ringtone, some Melbury™
notes, but then a pretty short,
low-tannins,
narrative
arc, ending in a quick mosh pit of acidity. Yes, a couple of weeks
ago I was at a tasting of some 2011 Bordeaux which ran the gamut from
fence paint to Aubusson tapestry (the Lynch Bages I would have taken
home there and then), so the old CDR suffers in comparison when
similarly stress-tested, and anyway what do I expect for just over a
fiver? It's a Kiera Knightley, as it turns out, with very much a 4:3
aspect ratio, but it passes the time.
A
strange feeling, doing without the soft fruits and the Approachable.
And
one reaches instinctively for the tannins,
whether one needs to or not. But
overall, I like the way things are going. It's fresh, it's
distinctive, it's nicely demotic. Yes,
a
part of me hankers after Finesse
and Blackcurrant
- but then a part of me still hankers after that elegant diction my
late Father used to employ when talking about wine: good old
Edwardian terms such as chétif,
gusto, blancmange, gutta-percha and
inner
sensorium.
Still. We must move on and embrace the future: autres
temps, autres mœurs.
CJ
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.