So
a friend of mine - the one who had the harebrained scheme for driving
wine all over the country, as it happens - says he's found an empty
bottle of Francis Coppola's wine in his house. It's a 2006 Merlot,
which he has no recollection of drinking, although he presumes it was
a pretty fair swill, as it was given to him by someone with a keen
interest in wine, and, possibly also, was to make amends for some
shambles engineered by that same wine enthusiast on a previous
occasion - a moral debt which always ups the chances of the gifted
drink being of reasonable quality.
He
shows me the bottle, which I handle reverently, even though there's
nothing in it. Why am I so respectful? The label is neither here nor
there, and I don't even like Californian wines - all that heft, that
'Fruit Bomb' crap, as suave as an episode of Wacky Races. It's
got to be down to the fact that Francis Ford Coppola has directed at
least three imperishably great movies - The Godfather, The
Conversation and Apocalypse
Now - and therefore enjoys, in
my head at least, the kind of status that makes anything he touches
of interest, even a Sonoma Valley red, even a berkish
one-size-fits-all Merlot varietal.
One
might, of course, make the same pathetic fan's-eye-view observation
of Paul Newman's salad dressings, or Marky Ramone's pasta sauce -
except for the fact that Coppola enjoys a couple of key advantages in
the celebrity food & drink business: his products are
award-winning wines, and therefore classy; and he is actually
involved in their production, rather than simply allowing his name to
be slapped on the label, as in the case of Sylvester Stallone's High Protein Pudding, Whitesnake's slightly incredible Zinfandel, or
Smokey Robinson's Gumbo. Indeed, only Cliff Richard's Vida Nova wines
(at one point the fastest selling wine Tesco has ever stocked) come
close for authenticity and sheer frisson.
Oh, and
I've even seen Coppola's Zoetrope HQ in San Francisco, located in the
iconic Sentinel Building, thereby affording me an extra bond of
intimacy - although at no point did I go into the downstairs café
for a Muffaletta and a taste of Director's Cut Pinot Noir at
$11 a glass, for
obvious reasons.
The only problem is that
I am now sitting and staring at an entirely empty bottle of Coppola Merlot, stirred both by a hunger to experience the thrill of
celebrity contact at several removes; and to remind myself (if indeed
I ever knew) what a Sonoma red tastes like. So I trudge down to the
supermarket, hoping against hope to find something approximating to a
West Coast Merlot; or with Cliff Richard's name on it.
To my amazement, I do: a
Barefoot Merlot (£6.99 at Waitrose), Gold Medal winner at the 2011
Critics' Challenge Wine Competition, which I carry home like a school
prize, and whose screw top I then dispatch with a practised flourish.
Not
bad. A bit heavy on the blackberries and chesty velvety stuff, more
like eating a sexy chocolate bar than drinking wine, but on the other
hand, some nice acidity, an entertainingly protracted fruit crumble
finish, and mercifully only 13%, as opposed to the 15% horrors I have
tangled with in the past. And here's a thing: if I was the sort of
person who (like PK) frets about appearances, I could decant this
stuff into the Coppola bottle and pass it off. After all, the Coppola
wine gets some very mixed online punters' reviews ('Mildly
disappointing'; 'Much better out there for half the price') and this
Barefoot stuff, although ultimately a bit sticky, does the job. By
God, I'm tempted. I could commit the imposture, then rub my hands
together and cackle like Dick Dastardly, just to let any interested parties know
that they were dealing with a criminal mastermind. And after that,
I could tip Asda own brand vodka into a Cîroc
bottle and pretend that P. Diddy had endorsed it.
Oh, wait, I don't
actually have an empty bottle of Cîroc,
and would have to buy it first. Drat and double drat.
CJ
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.