So
I'm sitting around trying to get through the remaining wine in my
doomed winerack before I can give myself over to the sensuous
realities of sheer gin, brooding at the same time over PK's own
broodings on the conditions required for drinking wine in the bath,
and wondering haphazardly if there are any activities which wouldn't
be enhanced by drinking wine concurrently with
the activity (with the proviso that in a couple of weeks it'll be
gin, that most supersubtle of servants) and of course the good
angel of my conscience comes up with the following: flying a
passenger jet; surgery; operating heavy machinery; handling
explosives; representing a disgraced celebrity in court.
Fair
enough. But that still leaves plenty of things you can
do with a glass of wine in your hand, a drink whose presence ought to
enhance rather than disrupt. For instance: ever since they let you
take a glass of wine in while you watched a movie, cinema has become
twice the pleasure it was, or three times. Even a film as
bewilderingly trite as The Theory Of Everything looks better through a disposable plastic goblet full of knockoff
Merlot. So (I reason, briefly) the same must be true of TV, only
more so, given that a) you can drink whatever wine you like, not just
Dead Man’s Red at £5 a glass b) seating conditions are
fractionally better even than in a really comfy cinema c) the choice
of what to watch is so vast, there will always be some kind of happy
wine/telly interface, no matter what the wine, no matter what the
crap on TV. Wine and TV pairings! Of course! Why has no-one thought
of this before?
Possibly
because, on reflection, it doesn’t work. Seeing a movie in the
cinema is an act full of positive elections, subtle mediations,
sensibility-modifiers, with or without the drink. You’re not just
consuming a film: you’re participating in an event, and this
inevitably works both in the medium’s and the drink's favour. Back
at home, however, it’s just you and the screen and the sitting-room
you’ve sat in for the last twenty years, and there’s nothing to
distract you from the awfulness of what’s on the screen or in the
glass.
And
it is awful, TV, apart from a handful of freakish singularities, to
the extent that no wine can actually improve the experience –
rather, it intensifies the despair and self-loathing you naturally
experience in front of Question
Time or
Britain's
Flashiest Families.
So the question then becomes (given that you're not not
going to drink TV wine)
how to minimise the hurt?
My
best guess, based on years of dead-eyed research,
slumped and glazed in front of the box, is to find a cheap,
industrial white, and make it your TV wine for all occasions. I'm
thinking Turning Leaf, Blossom Hill, Tesco Pinot Grigio. The great
thing is to avoid all
reds, because red wine angries up the blood, which is the last thing
you want when you're already simmering with contempt at what's
unfolding in front of you. Worst mistake in the world is to mix, say,
The
Jeremy Kyle Show
with a burly Australian Shiraz; you might as well call the police
right now and get it over with. Any exceptions? Property and property
makeover shows (Changing
Rooms,
A
Place In The Sun, Grand Designs, Location, Location, Location,
I could go on), where the will-they-won’t-they-screw-it-up
dependability of the narrative is so soporific, such a bromide, it
needs some
red rage to make it watchable. Also, anything involving antiques; or
a Journey Through Undiscovered Britain. Maybe a nice Saumur for
these.
Any
other alternatives to the zombie clutch of Blossom Hill? Yes:
sparkling white. Not actual champagne, clearly, but anything which
effervesces, suitable for The
X Factor
or Strictly
Come Dancing
or one of those charity tellythons or The
Eurovision Song Contest,
where your hysterical enjoyment of the programme is always
threatening to turn (without warning) into a desire to run amok with
a gun; or, conversely, Midsomer
Murders
or Death
In Paradise,
some braindead escapist procedural as meaningful as a prawn cracker,
and in need of something both stimulating and narcotic (Lidl Cava,
£3.50) to get through the alloted time. The only other
alternative - not wine at all, in fact - is a good gin & tonic
(of course!) or possibly whisky & soda, to be reserved for that
handful of imported thrillers/policiers/out-there
works of genius, by which I mean Breaking
Bad
or Spiral
or Homeland,
those rarities which are so satisfying and involving that they demand
your absolute attention, something impossible to manage if you're
full of wine, red, white, indifferent or high-end. Sad but true: but
good TV belongs to the Spirit World.
CJ
That last sentiment is so true. As the less than proud owner of 2 under-10s, for some reason I only get to watch classy TV after 9pm, ie when the wine drinking time has passed... Good TV = good spirits
ReplyDeleteThat is one of the better excuses I've heard for combining whisky + Broadchurch...
ReplyDelete